EBENEZER GOLBERT ASARE vs. MR. WANG & 3 ORS. [2016]DLHC3775

Date	2016-10-19
Suit No.	SUIT NO.OCC/48/15
Citation No.	[2016]DLHC3775

ANGELINA MENSAH-HOMIAH (MRS.) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT

IBRAHIM ADAMS FOR DEFENDANTS

WILLIAM KUSI FOR PLAINTIFF

[2016]DLHC3775
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" ><a name="OLE_LINK1">EBENEZER
GOLBERT ASARE<o:p></o:p></a>vs.<o:p></o:p>MR. WANG &amp; 3 ORS.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;[HIGH COURT (COMMERCIAL DIVISION), KUMASI]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

SUIT NO.OCC/48/15&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;DATE: 19TH OCTOBER, 2016<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL:&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>IBRAHIM
ADAMS FOR DEFENDANTS<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

WILLIAM KUSI FOR PLAINTIFF <o:p></o:p>

JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p>

</div>The
Plaintiff instituted the instant action against the 1st to 3rd
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Defendants herein on 27/10/14 and on
03/09/15, he applied to join 365 Daily Business Limited as the 4th Defendant.&nbsp; He sought four reliefs against the Defendants,
namely: <o:p></o:p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
i.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The recovery of an amount of Forty Thousand
Ghana Cedis ((GH¢ 40,000.00) being the amount of money the Defendants promised
to pay the Plaintiff for which they have failed to pay in spite of repeated
demands for same.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
ii.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
An order for the Defendants to pay damages
for unlawful dismissal.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;&nbsp;
iii.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
A further order for the Defendants to pay
the Plaintiff all his outstanding salaries.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;&nbsp;
iv.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
&nbsp;An
order for the Plaintiff to pay Defendant 5% of the total gold that the Defendant
conveyed from the mining site which is 730 grams.<o:p></o:p>After
entry of appearance, the Defendants caused their solicitor to file a statement
of defence on 11/11/14, but their defence was amended on 30/10/15 after the 4th
Defendant had been joined to the suit. <o:p></o:p>THE PLAINTIFF'S CASE.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;The Plaintiff described the 1st &nbsp;and 2nd &nbsp;Defendants as a married couple who manage the
4</main>