[2016]DLHC6277 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">J. ADDISON & CO. LTD<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:150%"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">{PLAINTIFF}<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">THE MINISTER, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION</span></b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> </span><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">{DEFENDANTS}</span></i><i><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> </span></i><b><span style="font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL & MINISTER OF JUSTICE</span></b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">[HIGH COURT (COMMERCIAL DIVISION), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:150%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">Suit No. RPC/81/14 DATE: 20<sup>TH</sup> JULY 2016<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">G. S. K. BABANAWO FOR PLAINTIFF <o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">AKAWARI ATINDEM FOR DEFENDANTS<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JENNIFER DODOO (MRS) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:150%; border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Plaintiff issued a writ against the Defendants claiming the following reliefs:<o:p></o:p></span></p><ol style="margin-top:0in" start="1" type="a"> <li class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The sum of GH¢18,458.29 being the final payment after the completion of the project.<o:p></o:p></span></li> <li class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">An amount of GH¢63,605.17 being the interest on the delay payments owing and due to the Plaintiff<o:p></o:p></span></li> <li class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">Interest on the said amount of GH¢63,605.17 from 20<sup>th</sup> November 2013 to the date of final payment.<o:p></o:p></span></li> <li class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">General Damages for the delay in the payment of the Contract sum and the interest leading to the Plaintiff being indebted to Sahel-Sahara Bank and Unibank which financed the construction of the project.<o:p></o:p></span></li> </ol><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Plaintiff, a limited liability company stated in its claim that it was awarded a contract to put up a 2 storey dormitory block for 220 students at Benkum Senior High School in the Akwapim North District. The project was to be completed within 12 months. According to the Plaintiff, the project was duly completed and handed over to the 1<sup>st</sup> Defendant. It contended that the 1<sup>st</sup> Defendant had breached the terms of payment encapsulated in Paragraph 43.1 of the Contract Document. The Plaintiff particularized these terms as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-indent: -1.0in;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">43.1 Payments shall be adjusted for deductions for advance payments and retention. The Employer shall pay the Contractor the amounts certified by the Project Manager within 28 days of each certificate. If the Employer makes a late payment, the Contractor shall be paid interest on the late payment in the next payment. Interest shall be calculated from the date by which the payment should have been made up to the date when the late payment is made at the prevailing rate of interest for Commercial borrowing for each of the currencies in which payments are made.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Plaintiff averred that the 1<sup>st</sup> Certificate was issued on 8<sup>th</sup> July 2011 and payment was effected on 24<sup>th</sup> August 2011, 18 days after the 28 days grace period for which payment should have been made had elapsed. The Plaintiff averred further that the 2<sup>nd</sup> Certificate was not applicable as it was payment for advance mobilization. Then the 3<sup>rd</sup> Certificate was issued on 15<sup>th</sup> December 2011 and payment was effected on 16<sup>th</sup> March 2012 which constituted a delay of 62 days after the expiration of the 28 day grace period. The 4<sup>th</sup> Certificate was issued on 12<sup>th</sup> June 2012 and payment effected on 10<sup>th</sup> September 2012 amounting to a 61 day delay. The 5<sup>th</sup> Certificate was issued on 16<sup>th</sup> November 2012 and payment made on 18<sup>th</sup> October 2013, a 307 day delay after the grace period of 28 days. The 6<sup>th</sup> Certificate was issued on 28<sup>th</sup> March 2013 and payment made on 20<sup>th</sup> November 2013, a 219 day delay after the expiration of the 28 day grace period.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Plaintiff’s complaint was that although the agreement was that interest on the late payment ought to be calculated from the date by which the payment should have been made up to the date when the late payment was made at the prevailing rate of interest for commercial borrowing for each of the currencies in which payments are made the 1<sup>st</sup> Defendant failed to follow the laid down formula. Instead, what the 1<sup>st</sup> Defendant did was to pay the amount on the certificate without calculating and adding the interest on the previous late payments. The total amount of interest on delay payment was given as GH¢63,605.17. The Plaintiff also stated that the final payment of GH¢18,458.29 on completion of the project still remained outstanding.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Defendants in their amended defence contended that the 1<sup>st</sup> Defendant only paid certificates certified by the Project Manager pursuant to paragraph 43 of the agreement. They contended further that the Plaintiff was required to raise the issue of interest on the delayed payment with the Project Manager to be added to subsequent payments in accordance with paragraph 43 of the Contract. If the Project Manager failed or refused to add claims made by the Plaintiff, paragraph 25 of the Agreement gave the Plaintiff the opportunity of challenging this refusal. The Plaintiff however failed to take advantage of this clause.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Defendants argued that the Plaintiff was estopped from claiming interest after it had taken the sum due it and for allowing time to elapse in order to reap more. They stated also that the Plaintiff had waived it