GODWIN ZAGBEDE (PLAINTIFF) vs. URBAN CREDIT LTD. (DEFENDANT) [2016]DLHC7244

Date	2016-01-19
Suit No.	SUIT NO. OCC/57/10
Citation No.	[2016]DLHC7244

HIS LORDSHIP GEORGE K. KOOMSON (J).

NASHIRU YUSSIF FOR PURCHASER/ APPLICANT PRESENT

MICHEAL AKAMBELL FOR PLAINTIF/ JUDGEMENT/ DEBTOR

[2016]DLHC7244
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >GODWIN
ZAGBEDE<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFF)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>URBAN CREDIT
LTD.<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANT)<o:p></o:p>[HIGH COURT (COMMERCIAL
DIVISION), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

SUIT
NO. OCC/57/10&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 19TH
JANUARY, 2016<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p>NASHIRU
YUSSIF FOR PURCHASER/ APPLICANT PRESENT <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

MICHEAL
AKAMBELL FOR PLAINTIF/ JUDGEMENT/ DEBTOR <o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p>HIS
LORDSHIP GEORGE K. KOOMSON (J).<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;
padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:center;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div>Counsel for applicant moves motion. It is opposed
by counsel for plaintiff/judgement/ debtor. I have read the application and the
affidavits filed by the parties. I have also given consideration to the
submissions of the lawyers. Thoughtful consideration have been given to order
45 rule 11(3) of C.I 47. It is noted that the sale of the property which took
place on the 9th April, 2015 has not been set aside by the
defendant/judgement/debtor/respondent or any other occupant of the sold
property. The sale is therefore deemed to be absolute. By order 45 rule 11(3)
of C.I.47, the purchaser/ applicant herein has the right to move the court to
recover possession of the property sold.<o:p></o:p>In my view, the purchaser should have possession of
the property she acquired by reason of the sale at the auction. In the
circumstance, I grant the application and hereby order the plaintiff/judgement/debtor
or any other person living or occupying the property on the authorization of
the plaintiff/judgement/debtor to vacate the said property within 30 days from
the date of this order. The purchaser/ applicant is hereby ordered to take
vacant possession of the said property after the expiration of the 30 days
given to the plaintiff/judgement/debtor/respondent. In the event the plaintiff/judgement/debtor
fails to give vacant possession peacefully to the purchaser/ applicant herein,
the Deputy Sheriff is hereby ordered to use reasonable force with the
assistance of police, to give vacant possession to the purchaser. I make no
order as to cost. <o:p></o:p>

<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></main>