AARON WISTON KWASHIE FIAGBEDZIE vs. MAWULI KARIMU AND TOGBE KPONOR KWASI [2017]DLCA4397

Date	2017-11-15
Suit No.	CIVIL APPEAL NO: H1/06/2017
Citation No.	[2017]DLCA4397

ADJEI J.A. (PRESIDING)

SOWAH J.A.

MENSAH J.A.

[2017]DLCA4397
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >AARON WISTON KWASHIE FIAGBEDZIE<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;(PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>MAWULI KARIMU AND TOGBE KPONOR KWASI<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;(DEFENDANT/APPELLANT/CO-DEFENDANT)<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[COURT OF APPEAL, HO]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

CIVIL
APPEAL NO:&nbsp; H1/06/2017&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;DATE: 15TH NOVEMBER, 2017<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:
<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

ADJEI
J.A. (PRESIDING), SOWAH J.A., MENSAH J.A. <o:p></o:p>

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p>

</div>SOWAH, J.A.:<o:p></o:p>Additional Grounds of Appeal:-<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:49.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-27.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;">1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Failure of the deciding Judge to realize that the
plaintiff/respondent as a Joint Administrator lacked capacity to execute any
agreement such as Exhibit ‘E’ with the defendant/appellant without any
authority such as a Power of Attorney from his mother as the other Joint
Administrator (Administrix).<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:49.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-27.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;">2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Failure of the deciding Judge to realize that Exhibit ‘E’ is
not any valid document executed by the defendant/appellant it having been
tempered with by plaintiff/respondent by unilaterally adding a site plan
thereto i.e. that the doctrine and/or principle of “Non Factum Est” applies.<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:49.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-27.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;">3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Failure of the deciding Judge to realize that failure of the
plaintiff/respondent to produce and/or tender any previous tenancy agreement
between his late father and the defendant/appellant’s late father is fatal to
his action.<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:49.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-27.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;">4.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Failure of the deciding Judge to realize that Exhibit ‘E’ is
unenforceable for lack of registration under S. 24 (1) of the Land Registry
Act, 1962.<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:49.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-27.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Bookman Old Style&quot;">5.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Failure of the deciding Judge to realize that Exhibit ‘R
one’ is only a self-serving document f</main>