[2017]DLCA4739 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span class="NoSpacingChar"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">FAUSTINA GYANEWA</span></b></span><span class="NoSpacingChar"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p></o:p></span></i></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span class="NoSpacingChar"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></span></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><span class="NoSpacingChar"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; color:#00B0F0">KWAHU SOUTH DISTRICT ASSEMBLY, MPRAESO KWAHU</span></b></span><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:#00B0F0"><o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="margin-bottom:6.0pt;text-align:center; line-height:115%"><span class="NoSpacingChar"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">(DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">[COURT OF APPEAL, KOFORIDUA]</span><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Arial Unicode MS"">SUIT NO: H1/03/2016</span></b><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Arial Unicode MS";mso-bidi-font-family:Tahoma"> </span></b><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: "Book Antiqua", serif;">DATE:</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""> 28<sup>TH</sup> FEBRUARY, 2017</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast"> <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">ANTWI ABANKWA ESQ. FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">MILLS ESQ. FOR THE DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">CORAM: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">ADJEI J.A. (PRESIDING), SOWAH J.A., MENSAH J.A. <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">JUDGMENT</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">ADJEI,J.A:<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">This appeal emanates from the judgment of the Circuit Court, Mpraeso delivered on 1<sup>st</sup> June,2015. The Plaintiff/Appellant who will be referred to as the Plaintiff in this appeal does not challenge the Judgement entered by the trial Court except that she is dissatisfied with the fact that interest and cost were not awarded by the trial Circuit Court.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Plaintiff is dissatisfied with the judgment on two grounds. The Plaintiff’s first dissatisfaction of the judgment was that the trial Judge failed to award interest when it was clear from the processes filed that the Defendant has been owing to the Plaintiff for barely six years and interest on the amount should have been awarded from 2009 when a demand was made for it. The Plaintiff’s second dissatisfaction with the judgment was that the trial Circuit Court Judge failed to award cost on the judgment sum.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The brief facts of the case which culminated in this appeal were that the Plaintiff sued the Defendant for the recovery of the sum GH5,903.00 being the cost of food and drinks supplied to the Defendant by the Plaintiff in 2009 which the Defendant willfully refused to pay despite repeated demands. The Plaintiff in her second relief claimed for interest on the amount from February,2009 to the date of final payment. The Defendant upon the service of his writ of summons and the statement of claim on it entered appearance. The Defendant entered appearance on 31<sup>st</sup> December, 2014. However, on 16<sup>th</sup> March, 2015 the Plaintiff filed an application ex parte for judgment in default of appearance. In the application for judgment in default of appearance even though it was incompetent as the Defendant had entered appearance, the Plaintiff attached annexures to her application to satisfy the Court that the Defendant has not got any defence to her action. There is no evidence that the application for judgment in default of appearance was heard. On 23<sup>rd</sup> March, 2015 the Plaintiff filed an application for judgment in default of defence. The Defendant in its affidavit to oppose the judgment in default of defence admitted owing the Plaintiff an amount of GH5,903.00 and explained that it made a payment of GH2,000.00 to the Plaintiff on 30<sup>th</sup> June,2011 when the Plaintiff had not instituted the action against it. Furthermore, after the institution of the action by the Plaintiff, the Defendant paid an amount of GH3,300.00 on 25<sup>th</sup> January,2015 and the Defendant was at that time owing an amount of GH607.00. The Plaintiff purported to pray for leave of the trial Circuit Court to amend the endorsement on her writ of summons to reflect an amount of GH3,073.80 which the Defendant owed her at the time of the institution of the action. The legal effect of all the wrong processes filed by the Plaintiff will be discussed in the course of the appeal. The judgment in default of defence was not heard and the Plaintiff on 18<sup>th</sup> May,2015 applied for judgment on admission. It is the grant of the judgment on admission which is the subject matter of this appeal.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The two grounds of appeal filed by the Plaintiff are as follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-indent: -.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">“1. The Judge was wrong in saying that the interest be calculated on GH3,907 from January,2015 to date of final payment since the Defendant became indebted to Plaintiff since 1<sup>st</sup> January,2009.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in;text-align:justify;text-indent: -.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">2. The judgment was wrong in refusing to award costs against the Defendant”.<o:p></o:p></span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">The Defendant has sought to challenge the competence of the appeal on the ground that the nature of the appeal is an interlocutory and the appeal should have been fil