[2017]DLCA5330 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:#00B0F0">THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:#00B0F0">OPANIN F.O. OSEI & 8 OTHERS.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">(RESPONDENTS / APPELLANTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">EX PARTE;</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman""> <b><span style="color:#00B0F0">ABUSUAPANIN SAMUEL ODOI & 3 OTHERS </span></b></span><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">(APPLICANTS/ RESPONDENTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">[COURT OF APPEAL, KOFORIDUA]<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">SUIT NO. H1 / 03 / 2017 25<sup>TH</sup> OCTOBER, 2017<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">FRANK YAKUBU FOR APPLICANTS/RESPONDENTS<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"">FRANK GEORGE DONKOR ESQ. FOR 2<sup>ND</sup>, 4<sup>TH</sup>, 5TH AND 7<sup>TH</sup> RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">DENNIS ADJEI J PRESIDING, CECILIA SOWAH J.A, L. L. MENSAH JA<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt; border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none; padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">ADJEI JA:<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman""><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman""> The High Court, Koforidua on 2nd June, 2014 convicted the 2nd, 4th and 5th Respondents for contempt and sentenced each of them to a fine of GH¢1,000.00 or 6 months I.H.L. The convicts dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence imposed on them by the trial High Court filed an appeal against both conviction and sentence to this Court. The notice of appeal against the conviction and sentence was filed on 20th June, 2014. In this appeal, the 2nd, 4th and 5th Respondents before the trial High Court are the Respondents/Appellants. The Applicants before the trial High Court are the Applicants / Respondents. For easy reference in this appeal, the Respondents/Appellants shall maintain their respective designations before the trial High Court as Respondents and the Applicants /Respondents as Applicants. The 6th Respondent before the trial High Court was convicted and sentenced by that Court and did not appeal against his conviction.<br> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--><br> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">The brief facts of the case before the trial High Court which culminated in this appeal were that the applicants filed a petition against the 4th Respondent and the 1<sup>st</sup>,2<sup>nd</sup>,3<sup>rd</sup> and 5<sup>th</sup> Respondents herein at the Judicial Committee of the Akwamu Traditional Council in April, 2008 claiming, inter alia, a declaration that the stool in the possession of the petitioners therein is the original Gyansere Stool , and an order declaring the installation of the 4th Respondent herein as Gyansere null and void . The Applicants in their supporting affidavit to the application for contempt deposed that they belong to the Royal Aduana Amoakware Family of Akwamu and it is the only family which occupies the Kyidom Stool of Akwamu. They further deposed that the stool name " Gyensere" is the title exclusively used by the occupants of the Kyidom Stool of Akwamu Traditional Council but the Respondents have conferred the title "Gyensere " on the 4th Respondent who hails from a different family and occupies the Pianko Stool and therefore not eligible to assume that stool title preserved for the Respondents Royal Family. The 6th Respondent was the registrar of Akwamu Traditional Council who submitted the name of the 4th Respondent to the National House of Chiefs to be gazetted with the stool name " Gyensere" when it was alleged that there was a pending suit pending before the Judicial Committee of the Akwamu Traditional Council as to whether or not the 4th Respondent is eligible to use that title or that. The 7th Respondent was the acting President of the Akwamu Traditional Council and he together with the 6th Respondent wrote to the Eastern Regional House of Chiefs and the National House of Chiefs to register and gazette the 4th Respondent with the stool title Gyensere. The Applicants did not depose to the specific roles played by the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 8th Respondents but the Applicants in their paragraph 12 of the supporting affidavit deposed that they were fully aware of the petition filed before the Judicial Committee of the Akwamu Traditional Council and were the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th Respondents respectively therein and should not have applied for the 4th Respondent to be gazetted with the stool name Gyensere. All the Respondents denied the fact that they were in contempt of the proceedings pending before the Judicial Committee of the Akwamu Traditional Council in their respective affidavits in opposition filed before the trial High Court.<br> <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--><br> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"">The trial High Court convicted the 2nd, 4th 5th and 7th, Respondent for contempt and sentenced them accordingly. The 2nd, 4th and 5th Respondents dissatisfied with their conviction and sentence filed two grounds of appeal against both conviction and sentence. The grounds of appeal are as follows:<br> <b><i> <o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-to