[2017]DLCA5470 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:#00B0F0">NANA OWUSU AMEYAW<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">(PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:#00B0F0">MAXWELL ARMAH AND 3 OTHERS<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">(DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">[COURT OF APPEAL, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">CIVIL APPEAL NO. H1/146/2016 DATE: 27<sup>TH</sup> JULY, 2017<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">FRIMPONG BOADU FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT <o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">GEORGE ESHUN WITH E. J. MARTINS FOR THE 2<sup>ND</sup> DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">CORAM: <o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%;border:none; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">F.G. KORBIEH J.A. (PRESIDING), K.N. ADUAMA OSEI J.A., G.S. SUURBAAREH J.A.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%; border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in; mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in"><b><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><u><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">F.G. KORBIEH, J.A.<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><b><u><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial"><o:p><span style="text-decoration-line: none;"> </span></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">The brief facts of the case leading to this appeal are as follows. The plaintiff/appellant herein sued per his lawful attorney. He averred in his amended statement of claim that he had a sales agreement with one Ehrengried Kojo Mawudeka to buy from the latter his piece or parcel of land at the Airport Residential Area in Accra for the sum of US$180,000.00. The sale agreement was dated 19/6/1997. The plaintiff/appellant’s averment continued as follows: the said land had been leased to one Christo John Philip Pakis by the President of the Republic of Ghana for a term of 50 years and Christo John Philip Pakis had in turn assigned his unexpired interest in the land to the Church of Christ which assignment had received the consent of the Lands Commission. “5.By a deed of assignment made between Christo John Philip Pakis and EHRENGRIED KOJO MAWUDEKA and dated the 20<sup>th</sup> day of September 1971 the Church of Christ assigned her interest in the said land for the residue unexpired term. The said EHRENGRIED KOJO MAWUDEKA registered the said deed of Assignment at the Lands Commission with the Land Registry NO 590/1972. 6. Pursuant to the assignment by the said EHRENGRIED KOJO MAWUDEKA to the Plaintiff paid to the assignor EHRENGRIED KOJO MAWUDEKA the Plaintiff paid US$180,000 to the assignor.” (sic) The plaintiff further averred that due to the fact that the plaintiff’s attorney applied to register the deed of assignment at the Lands Commission, the Commission opened a file but the file subsequently disappeared and some staff of the Commission fraudulently tried to sell the plaintiff’s land in collusion with the other defendants. The plaintiff therefore claimed the following reliefs from the defendants jointly and severally:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin-left:31.2pt;mso-add-space: auto;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;line-height:115%;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">a)<span style="font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">Recovery of possession;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:31.2pt;mso-add-space: auto;text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;line-height:115%;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">b)<span style="font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span><!--[endif]--><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">Damages for trespass; and <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin-left:31.2pt;mso-add-space:auto; text-align:justify;text-indent:-.25in;line-height:115%;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><i><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua";mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">c)<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman";"> </span></span></i><!--[endif]--><i><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">“Perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants, whether by themselves, their servants, assigns, agents, workmen or otherwise howsoever from interfering with the Plaintiff’s title and possession of the land.” <o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial"><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Book Antiqua","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial">It is interesting to note that only the 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> defendants filed any statements of defence. In response to the plaintiff’s averments, one of the 3<sup>rd</sup> defendant’s averments was to the effect that he did not know the 1<sup>st</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> defendants. He also averred that the plaintiff had issued a writ against the 2<sup>nd</sup> defendant and that the executors of the will of the late Mawudeku had applied to be joined to that suit. He again averred that until the property in dispute was sold to the 2<sup>nd</sup> defendant, it was in the possession of the executors of the will of Mawudeku. He denied that the plaintiff was entitled to the reliefs he was claiming from the court. In her statement of defence and counterclaim, the 2<sup>nd</sup> defendant/respondent averred, among other things, as follows: that the plaintiff was an imposter and had planned with the 1<sup>st</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> defendants to deprive her of the property she had legally acquired from the executors of the will of Ehrenfried Kojo Mawudeka. She then counterclaimed for House No. Z67, Tsatsa Close, Airport Residential Area, Accra on the grounds that interests in it had been assigned to her by the executors of the will of Ehrenfried Kojo Mawudeka and the 3<sup>rd</sup> defendant and that she had been given immediate possession upon payment of a substantial part of the agreed sum. She had averred further that after she took possession of the property, she was sued in the High Court by the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant and that the 4<sup>th</sup> defendant used to accompany the 1<sup>st</sup> defendant to court. She also averred that when the 4<sup>th</sup> defendant forcibly entered the property with land-guards claiming to act in the name of the widow of the deceased original owner of the property, she reported the matter to the Police whereupon the 4<sup>th</sup> defendant