ANDREW NII KOI DSANE AND NII JOHN AFUTU ASHIE vs BENJAMIN AMON DSANE & 3 ORS [2017]DLHC16364

Date	2017-02-09
Suit No.	SUIT NO. L/86/96
Citation No.	[2017]DLHC16364

HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE ANTHONY OPPONG

MISS. LAWRENCIA GHANSAH

GEORGE HEWARD MILLS

MR. ALBERT ADAARE

[2017]DLHC16364
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" ><a name="_Hlk146980440"></a><a name="_Hlk146981432">ANDREW NII KOI DSANE AND NII JOHN
AFUTU ASHIE<o:p></o:p></a>(PLAINTIFFS)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>BENJAMIN AMON DSANE &amp; 3 ORS<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANTS)<span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:
115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;color:#4F81BD;mso-themecolor:accent1;
mso-style-textoutline-type:solid;mso-style-textoutline-fill-color:#00B0F0;
mso-style-textoutline-fill-alpha:100.0%;mso-style-textoutline-outlinestyle-dpiwidth:
.75pt;mso-style-textoutline-outlinestyle-linecap:flat;mso-style-textoutline-outlinestyle-join:
round;mso-style-textoutline-outlinestyle-pctmiterlimit:0%;mso-style-textoutline-outlinestyle-dash:
solid;mso-style-textoutline-outlinestyle-align:center;mso-style-textoutline-outlinestyle-compound:
simple;mso-effects-shadow-color:#6E747A;mso-effects-shadow-alpha:43.0%;
mso-effects-shadow-dpiradius:3.0pt;mso-effects-shadow-dpidistance:2.0pt;
mso-effects-shadow-angledirection:5400000;mso-effects-shadow-align:center;
mso-effects-shadow-pctsx:100.0%;mso-effects-shadow-pctsy:100.0%;mso-effects-shadow-anglekx:
0;mso-effects-shadow-angleky:0;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"><o:p></o:p>[HIGH COURT,
ACCRA]<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 6.5pt;">

SUIT NO.
L/86/96&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 9TH FEBRUARY 2017<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>MISS. LAWRENCIA GHANSAH FOR GEORGE HEWARD MILLS
FOR PLAINTIFFS<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 6.5pt;">

</div>CORAM <o:p></o:p>HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE
ANTHONY OPPONG<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: windowtext; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm;">

<p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;border:none;
mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>The Plaintiffs obtained judgment against the Defendants and to realize the fruits of their Judgment, they have sought
to levy execution over the subject matter of that Judgment. That subject matter
in dispute is land situate
at Oyibi. Upon applying for writ
of possession to issue, the Plaintiffs, as required by Law, served notice of
the proceedings on occupants on the land whereupon the interested party
applied under the law for relief.<o:p></o:p>The
interested party has made a case that they have been sued over the subject
matter over ownership over the land and that case is currently pending before a
Court of competent jurisdiction. The Plaintiff/Judgement/Creditors are not
disputing the fact of the pendency
of that case but they have attempted to demonstrate the unlikelihood of that case being successfully defended.
I must say that I should not be interested in ascertaining the merits or the demerits
by that case since it is not within my jurisdiction
to purport to determine that pending case in this application. Therefore for
the fact of the pendency of the case, I am satisfied that the interested party
has shown enough an interest in the property as to entitle
them to remain in occupation or possession pending the determination of the case
they are defending.<o:p></o:p>From the foregoing I will<span</main>