GIBSON K. POKU vs. DOROTHY YAA MANSAH OPOKU [2017]DLHC3944

Date	2017-08-16
Suit No.	SUIT NO. GJ/477/2017
Citation No.	[2017]DLHC3944

KWEKU T. ACKAAH-BOAFO JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT

MR. PETER BOAFO FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT

MR. SHAHADU MOHAMMED FOR THE DEFENDANT/RESP

[2017]DLHC3944
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >GIBSON K. POKU<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>DOROTHY YAA
MANSAH OPOKU<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;[HIGH COURT (GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION),
ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in;margin-left:0in;margin-right:.2in">

SUIT&nbsp;NO.
GJ/477/2017&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 16TH AUGUST,
2017<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>MR. PETER
BOAFO FOR
THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in;margin-left:0in;margin-right:.2in">

MR. SHAHADU MOHAMMED FOR
THE DEFENDANT/RESP <o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM: <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in;margin-left:0in;margin-right:.2in">

KWEKU T.
ACKAAH-BOAFO JUSTICE OF THE
HIGH COURT<o:p></o:p>

</div><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-top:1.45pt;margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:center;
line-height:115%;mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:
none"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in;margin-left:0in;margin-right:.2in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-top:1.45pt;margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:center;
line-height:115%;mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:
none;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;
mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:1.45pt;margin-right:402.85pt;margin-bottom:
0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none">Introduction:<o:p></o:p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:3.8pt;margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none">[1]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Order 25 r 1 of CI 47 stipulates that the court may
grant an injunction by an interlocutory
order in all cases in which it appea</main>