HANNAH ASANTE & ANO. (APPLICANTS) vs. KWADJO ASANTE CONTRACT LTD & ORS. (RESPONDENTS) [2017]DLHC7371

HANNAH ASANTE & ANO. (APPLICANTS) vs. KWADJO ASANTE CONTRACT LTD & ORS. (RESPOND... [2017]DLHC7371

Date	2017-12-06
Suit No.	SUIT NO.: MISC/0096/2017
Citation No.	[2017]DLHC7371

HIS LORDSHIP SAMUEL K. A. ASIEDU J.

MR. MARTIN KPEBU FOR THE APPLICANTS

MR. LEONARD SEDZRO FOR 3RD AND 4TH REPOSNDENTS

MR. SLUEMAN MUSAH FOR KWASI AMOAKO ADJEI FOR THE 1ST 2ND 5TH AND 6TH RESPONDENTS

[2017]DLHC7371
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >IN THE MATTER OF THE
COMPANIES ACT, 1963 (ACT 179)<o:p></o:p>IN THE MATTER OF KWADJO
ASANTE CONTRACT LIMITED<o:p></o:p>AND<o:p></o:p>IN THE MATTER OF AN
APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 99, 217 AND 218 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1963 (ACT 179)<o:p></o:p>HANNAH ASANTE &amp; ANO.<o:p></o:p>(APPLICANTS)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>KWADJO ASANTE CONTRACT
LTD &amp; ORS.<o:p></o:p>(RESPONDENTS)<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[HIGH COURT (COMMERCIAL DIVISION), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

SUIT NO.: MISC/0096/2017&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;DATE:
6TH DECEMBER, 2017<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p>MR. MARTIN KPEBU FOR THE APPLICANTS <o:p></o:p>MR. LEONARD SEDZRO FOR 3RD AND 4TH REPOSNDENTS <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

MR. SLUEMAN MUSAH FOR KWASI AMOAKO ADJEI FOR
THE 1ST, 2ND, 5TH AND 6TH
RESPONDENTS <o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p>HIS LORDSHIP SAMUEL K. A.
ASIEDU, J.<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;
padding:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div>The court has considered the
application for injunction filed by the applicants herein against the
respondents.<o:p></o:p>In view of the depositions
in the affidavits in support and in opposition as well as the supplementary
affidavits and all the exhibits attached, the court is of the view that it is
not possible for the application to be dealt with, without a discussion of
matters or issues which may affect the substantive matter pending before the
court.<o:p></o:p>For this reason, the court
has decided that instead of deciding on the motion for interlocutory
injunction, it will rather give consideration to an expeditious hearing of the
substantive case before the court.<o:p></o:p>The case will, therefore, be
set down for hearing on the 20th of December, 2017. The lawyers for
the parties are, therefore, ordered to file their statement of case in respect
of the substantive case latest by the 15th day of December, 2017 so
that the case may be heard on the 20th day of&nbsp; December, 2017.<o:p></o:p>The court orders accordingly.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>

<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></main>