MADAM ESTHER SEY (PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT) vs. JOSEPH A. QUAYE (DEFENDANT/APPELLANT) [2019]DLCA7723

MADAM ESTHER SEY (PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT) vs. JOSEPH A. QUAYE (DEFENDANT/APPELLANT... [2019]DLCA7723

Date	2019-11-14
Suit No.	SUIT NO.: H1/94/2019
Citation No.	[2019]DLCA7723

LOVELACE-JOHNSON J.A. (PRESIDING)

TORKORNOO J. A.

POKU-ACHEAMPONG J.A.

EMEFA FIAWOO FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT

ANDREWS N. O. TETTEH FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT

[2019]DLCA7723
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >MADAM ESTHER SEY<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;
line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p>JOSEPH A. QUAYE<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANT/APPELLANT)<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[COURT
OF APPEAL, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

SUIT
NO.: H1/94/2019&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 14TH
NOVEMBER, 2019<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>EMEFA
FIAWOO FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

ANDREWS
N. O. TETTEH FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

LOVELACE-JOHNSON
J.A. (PRESIDING), TORKORNOO J. A., POKU-ACHEAMPONG J.A.<o:p></o:p>

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

</div>ARVIL LOVELACE JOHNSON (JA):<o:p></o:p>This
is an appeal against the judgment of the Land Division of the High Court dated
29th November 2017 by which the said court had granted the reliefs
sought by the plaintiff.<o:p></o:p>Per
her amended writ dated 4th July 2016, the Plaintiff sought the
following reliefs which were denied by the defendant.<o:p></o:p>a.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A declaration that the
disputed land is a public access &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<o:p></o:p>Route<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-top:0cm;margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:90.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;
text-align:justify;text-indent:-18.0pt;line-height:115%;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo2">b.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An order of perpetual
injunction restraining Defendant, &nbsp;<o:p></o:p>His
agents, hirelings, assigns and/or any person howsoever described and claiming
under or through him from extending any part of Defendant’s property into the
public access route which is the subject of this dispute. An order of perpetual
injunction restraining Defendant, &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<o:p></o:p>his
agents, hirelings, assigns and/or any person howsoever described and claiming
under or through him from continuing with any further construction works in
respect of the fence wall he seeks to build on the disputed public access
route, the subject matter of this dispute<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>d.
General damages<o:p></o:p>e.
Costs on full indemnity basis<o:p></o:p>