JAMES LUMOR, WILLIAM DATSOMOR AND MICHAEL BLUVI (PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS) vs. ITAL PRESTRESS CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS (IPCP) LIMITED (DEFENDANT/APPELLANT) [2019]DLCA7778

JAMES LUMOR, WILLIAM DATSOMOR AND MICHAEL BLUVI (PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS) vs. ITA... [2019]DLCA7778

Date	2019-10-24
Suit No.	SUIT NO H1/75/2019
Citation No.	[2019]DLCA7778

ADJEI J.A

LOVELACE J.A

KWOFIE J.A

[2019]DLCA7778
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >JAMES LUMOR,
WILLIAM DATSOMOR AND MICHAEL BLUVI<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS)<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;
line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; color: rgb(0, 176, 240); background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">ITAL PRESTRESS CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS (IPCP) LIMITED<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANT/APPELLANT)<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[COURT
OF APPEAL, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

SUIT
NO H1/75/2019&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 24TH OCTOBER, 2019<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

ADJEI
J.A, LOVELACE J.A, KWOFIE J.A<o:p></o:p>

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

</div><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">Adjei,
J.A:<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">The three Plaintiffs in the court below took an action
against their employer, the Defendant but the 2nd Plaintiff&nbsp; abandoned his claim&nbsp; in the&nbsp;
course of the trial&nbsp; and therefore&nbsp; had&nbsp;
his claim dismissed . The Plaintiffs in the High Court were claiming for
six reliefs and all of them bordering on employer - employee relationship. The
reliefs sought by the Plaintiffs in the High Court against the Defendant are as
follows:<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">“i.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A
declaration that&nbsp; having been in the
continuous employment of the Defendant for several years and&nbsp; after having been variously promoted on
merit&nbsp; to higher grades and warded&nbsp; Long service Awards, the Plaintiffs’ employment
with the Defendant ought to have been deemed to have become statutorily
converted into permanent contracts of employment pursuant to Section 75(i) of
the Labour Act, 2003, Act 651.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">ii.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An
order that the Plaintiffs shall be deemed and accorded the status of permanent
employees and remunerated accordingly pursuant to Section 75 of Act 651.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">iii.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A
declaration&nbsp; that the failure and or
refusal&nbsp; by the Defendant to treat and
remunerate&nbsp; the plaintiffs as permanent employees&nbsp; derogates from the Plaintiffs’ conditions
and&nbsp; quality of employment; discriminates
between the plaintiffs and the&nbsp; so-called
permanent employees at the workplace by denying&nbsp;
the Plaintiffs&nbsp; the right to join
a trade union and also constitutes an unfair&nbsp;
labour practice&nbsp; by the Defendant
under Section &nbsp;127 of the Labour
Act,2003,Act 651.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">iv.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Damages
for the Defendant’s discrimination against&nbsp;
the Plaintiffs at the workplace&nbsp;
and for&nbsp; its unfair labour
practice against them.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">v.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An
order for the payment to the Plaintiffs of any entitlements, rights and or privileges
they would have been entitled to but for the unlawful conduct of the Defendant.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial;">vi.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Further
or in the alternative having originally created the impression that was
employing the Plaintiffs as permanent employees, it was entirely wrong for the Defendant
to turn&nbsp; round years&nbsp; later&nbsp;
to attempt to bully&nbsp; Them into
signing&nbsp; a short –term contract of 2
years duration at a time”.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;, serif; background-image: initial; background-position: initial; background-size: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-att</main>