SAMUEL AWUAH DANKWA vs. ALLIANCE MOTORS GHANA LTD AND STANBIC BANK GHANA LTD [2019]DLHC6800

Date	2019-02-22
Suit No.	SUIT NO: GJ/915/2017
Citation No.	[2019]DLHC6800

HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE KWEKU T. ACKAAH-BOAFO

MR. KWABENA BOYE ADJEKUMHENE FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT

MR. FRANK ASAMOAH FOR THE 1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT

[2019]DLHC6800
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >SAMUEL AWUAH DANKWA<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>ALLIANCE MOTORS GHANA
LTD AND STANBIC BANK GHANA LTD<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS)<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[HIGH COURT (GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION, COURT 6),
ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

SUIT
NO: GJ/915/2017 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;DATE: 22TH
FEBRUARY, 2019<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL: <o:p></o:p>MR. KWABENA BOYE
ADJEKUMHENE FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

MR.
FRANK ASAMOAH FOR THE 1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT <o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:
<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

HIS
LORDSHIP JUSTICE KWEKU T. ACKAAH-BOAFO<o:p></o:p>

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in">

</div>i.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Introduction:<o:p></o:p>[1]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The
Plaintiff issued a Writ of Summons against the Defendants on June 16, 2017 for
certain reliefs endorsed thereon. Among the reliefs the Plaintiff is seeking
are:<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>i)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A
declaration that the brand new Land Rover Discovery 4 HSE which the Plaintiff
bought from the 1st Defendant on the 10th day of April 2014 has a manufacturer
defect and therefore same is not fit for the purpose for which same was bought.<o:p></o:p>ii) &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A
declaration that the 1st Defendant has breached the warranty agreement on the
vehicle sold to the Plaintiff. <o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[2]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The
Plaintiff is also seeking an order directed at the 1st Defendant to replace the
said vehicle with a brand new one and against the 2nd Defendant the Plaintiff
seeks an “interim order of injunction directed at the 2nd Defendant to restrain
it from receiving the monthly repayment on the said vehicle from the Plaintiff
until the final determination of this suit”.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>&nbsp;[3]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Pleadings have closed and the parties
have filed their witness statements pursuant to the Court’s orders made after
the application for directions was taken. The mandatory Case Management
Conference is yet to be conducted. Now, the Plaintiff has brought the instant application
for an interim order of mandatory injunction against the 1st Defendant.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[4]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; It is noted that Order 25 r 1 of CI 47
stipulates that the court may grant an injunction by an interlocu</main>