[2019]DLHC8245 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;color:#00B0F0;mso-ansi-language: EN-US">THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="margin-bottom:6.0pt;text-align:center; line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0;mso-ansi-language:EN-US">BUGADAM ACHIGATERA<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri">[HIGH COURT</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">, BOLGATANGA]</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri"><o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">D16/23/2017 </span></b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif"> DATE: 31<sup>ST</sup> JULY, 2019<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif;mso-ansi-language:EN-US">COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-ansi-language:EN-US">EMMANUEL OTOO BOISON FOR THE REPUBLIC <o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-ansi-language:EN-US">ADAZABRA FOR THE ACCUSED <o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:"Book Antiqua"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Book Antiqua"">CORAM:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"> <p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt: solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span class="NoSpacingChar"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE JACOB B. BOON<o:p></o:p></span></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="line-height:115%"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US">Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, we have come to an important stage of the trial of the accused person who is charged on one count with murder contrary to section 46 of the Criminal Offences Act of Ghana 1960, Act 29. It is now my duty to sum up the record of the trial to pave the way for you to take a decision regarding the guilt or innocence of the accused person, Bugadam Achigatera, who claims to be a farmer, and also assist in loading the wares of women who seasonally travel from Ghana to Burkina Faso to buy tomatoes.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US">It is important to emphasise that during your deliberations, you are to restrict yourselves to the record of the trial. You must not take any matter outside what transpired at the trial into consideration. Also be informed that all matters of fact are within your domain to consider, whilst you are bound by my directions on all questions of law. If in the course of this direction, I express an opinion on a matter of fact, you are not bound by my opinion. You are at liberty to ignore it and form your own opinion on that matter. An example of a question of fact is the weight to be attached to the evidence of witnesses. Whether or not to believe the evidence of a witness is a matter of fact. It is therefore part of your duty to determine if a witness testified truthfully or not. Again, another important matter is that as accused is charged with murder, your verdict must be unanimous. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US">As I indicated, the accused before you is charged on one count with murder. Murder is a serious offence in the laws of Ghana, the punishment of which is death upon conviction. The accused is alleged to have inflicted unlawful harm on his uncle called Liraseh Nasara on the 12<sup>th</sup> day of November, 2016, leading to his death. The deceased, Liraseh Nasara, is the elder brother of the father of the accused, Bachikatera Achari, who, you will recall, was called by the prosecution as their third witness (PW3). The other facts as presented by the prosecution were that on the day in question, the accused and the deceased, who are related, and natives of Nyania near Paga, attended a funeral nearby. On returning home separately, around five o’clock in the evening, they caught up with each other on path close to the house of the deceased, and the accused alleged the deceased hit him with a bicycle he, the deceased, was then riding. This led to an argument between them when accused is alleged to have picked a stick in an attempt to hit the deceased. Fearing for his life, the deceased abandoned his bicycle and ran towards his house but the accused followed him to his house still poised to assault him in the presence of deceased’s wife, Kuchuriba Liraseh, who also gave evidence as the first prosecution witness (PW1). In the house of the deceased, prosecution alleged that the accused got hold of the deceased, and for fear of the safety of her husband, the wife rushed out to the next house to ask for help to rescue her husband, but unfortunately, no man was present, apparently because all the men were at the funeral.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US">According to the wife, when she returned to the house, she saw the deceased lying in a pool of blood with a hammer they kept in the house and usually used in the process of tethering their animals, lying by him. Prosecution’s case is that when the wife ran out of the house in search of others to rescue her husband from the wrath of the accused, her husband was left with accused alone in the house. No one else was present. The evidence is that the deceased lived with his wife alone, so at the time the accused chased the deceased to the house, it was only the wife who was present. Prosecution asserted that when the wife returned to the house without anybody to assist her husband, she, on her own, could not do anything until the following day when the father of the deceased already referred to, (PW3), and others came to the house and rushed the deceased to the Navrongo War Memorial Hospital but he passed away the next day, that is on 14<sup>th</sup> November, 2016, in the afternoon. Accused was arrested after he turned himself up to the Paga police to avoid being lynched by the community. He was later charged and brought before you after investigations.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US">It is the prosecution who preferred the charge of murder against the accused person. The law therefore is that the prosecution must lead credible evidence to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt, and not fanciful doubt. This principle of law is very important in every criminal trial and must not escape you in your deliberations. It is equally of some importance to let you know that there is no burden on the accused to prove his innocence. It is the prosecution that must prove the guilt of the accused person having laid the charge against him. At the end of your deliberations, after you have considered all the evidence led at this trial, including the defence put up by the accused, no doubt should be left in your minds that it is the accused, and no one else, who caused the death of the deceased through the infliction of unlawful harm and the harm was intended to lead to the death of the deceased. If you are sufficiently persuaded that the prosecution has discharged the burden of proving all the elements of the offence of murder, then you must return a verdict of guilty of murder. But if any doubt lingers in your minds as to whether or not the death of the deceased was as a result of the conduct of the accused, your verdict will be that of not guilty as the doubt will inure to the advantage of the accused because that would have meant that the prosecution failed to discharge the burden placed on them by law to prove the charge against the accused beyond reasonable doubt.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US">The elements o