SAMUEL BADU BOTCHWAY AND CLEMENT BOTCHWAY vs. DOMINIC ASAMOAH DANQUAH AND DANNIEL BORKETEY BOIFIO A.K.A NII BAATSONAA [2019]DLHC8975

SAMUEL BADU BOTCHWAY AND CLEMENT BOTCHWAY vs. DOMINIC ASAMOAH DANQUAH AND DANNI... [2019]DLHC8975

Date	2019-12-17
Suit No.	SUIT NO.: LD/1112/2019
Citation No.	[2019]DLHC8975

BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE E. K. BOSOMPEM APENKWAH J.

FELIX QUARTEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF

SAMUEL KOFI NARTEY HOLDING BRIEF FOR DENNIS ADJEI DWOMOH WITH

HIM IS NAA DROMO ADJABENG FOR THE DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS

[2019]DLHC8975
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >SAMUEL BADU BOTCHWAY AND
CLEMENT BOTCHWAY<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFFS/APPLICANTS)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>DOMINIC ASAMOAH DANQUAH
AND DANNIEL BORKETEY BOIFIO A.K.A NII BAATSONAA<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS)<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[HIGH COURT (LAND DIVISION 5), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

SUIT
NO.: LD/1112/2019&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE: 17TH DECEMBER, 2019<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>FELIX QUARTEY FOR THE
PLAINTIFF <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

SAMUEL
KOFI NARTEY HOLDING BRIEF FOR DENNIS ADJEI DWOMOH WITH HIM IS NAA DROMO
ADJABENG FOR THE DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS <o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

BEFORE
HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE E. K. BOSOMPEM APENKWAH J.<o:p></o:p>

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>The
Plaintiffs/Applicants have applied for interlocutory injunction to restrain the
Defendants/Respondents in this suit either by themselves, their agents,
servants, privies, hirelings or workmen or howsoever described from interfering
or developing the disputed land pending the final determination of this suit.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>Under Order
25 rule 1(6) of the Civil Procedure Rules, C. I 47, the court is permitted to
determine the application on the basis of the papers filed. The court is also permitted
to direct lawyers in the suit to address it on specific points of law and or
facts. <o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>This has been
done. The principles which govern the grant or refusal of interlocutory
injunctions are well-settled in case law.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>They may be
summarized as follows:<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">(i)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The right the Applicant is seeking to protect exists
and that there has been an unjustified interference by the Respondent.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">(ii)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;