VICTORIA FRIMPONG vs. HENRY NELSON , THE REGISTRAR AND SINAPI ABA SAVINGS AND LOANS LTD [2019]DLHC9048

VICTORIA FRIMPONG vs. HENRY NELSON , THE REGISTRAR AND SINAPI ABA SAVINGS AND L... [2019]DLHC9048

Date	2019-07-11
Suit No.	SUIT NO. GJ 1033/2019
Citation No.	[2019]DLHC9048

HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE JENNIFER A. DADZIE

ROBERT DAVIES ALLOTEY ESQ. OF LAW & MORE CONSULT (ELIKEM CHAMBERS) LATERBIOKORSHIE ACCRA COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT.

JENNIFER POKUA ENYAN ESQ. OF LAW TIMES LEGAL CONSULTANCY ACHIMOTA ACCRA COUNSEL FOR 3RD DEFENDANT/APPLICANT

[2019]DLHC9048
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >VICTORIA FRIMPONG<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>HENRY NELSON (1ST
DEFENDANT), THE REGISTRAR (2ND
DEFENDANT) AND SINAPI ABA SAVINGS
AND LOANS LTD (3RD DEFENDANT/APPLICANT)<o:p></o:p>[HIGH
COURT, (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>ROBERT DAVIES ALLOTEY, ESQ., OF LAW &amp; MORE CONSULT
(ELIKEM CHAMBERS), LATERBIOKORSHIE, ACCRA, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT.<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm;margin-left:0cm;margin-right:.2pt">

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:
justify;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">JENNIFER POKUA
ENYAN, ESQ., OF LAW TIMES LEGAL CONSULTANCY, ACHIMOTA, ACCRA, COUNSEL FOR 3RD
DEFENDANT/APPLICANT<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p>HER LADYSHIP, JUSTICE JENNIFER A. DADZIE<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;border-right:none;
padding:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;line-height:115%;
border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:
solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>This
is an application filed by the 3rd Defendant seeking to dismiss the
Plaintiff’s suit upon grounds set out in the supporting affidavit.&nbsp; It is noted that the 3rd Defendant
was originally not a party to the instant suit.&nbsp;
The 3rd Defendant upon its own application was joined to the
suit pursuant to the order of the Court entered on April 29, 2019.&nbsp; It is subsequent to its joinder that it has
filed the present application to dismiss the Plaintiff’s action which seeks per
the endorsement on the amended writ of summons the following reliefs:<o:p></o:p>a.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Declaration that there was
no public auction sale of H/No. 122 New Aplaku being Plaintiff’s property on
the 11th January, 2018<o:p></o:p>b.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An order setting aside the
purported or supposed auction sale dated 11th January, 2018<o:p></o:p>c.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An order restraining the 2nd
defendant from issuing any person or the suppose purchase with the writ of
possession in respect of Plaintiff’s property.<o:p></o:p>d.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An order setting aside any
certificate of purchase issued in respect of the subject matter <o:p></o:p><!--[if !supportLists]-</main>