MILPAR INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPER LTD AND NII ASHITEY CHURCHILL ARMAH vs. ALFRED NII QUARTEY-PAPAFIO, JOSEPH KWATE QUARTEY-PAPAFIO. ERNESTINA KWAKOR QUARETY-PAPAFIO, KING ODAIFIO WELENTSI (III), MAX ESTATES LTD AND NTHC/ERIC ODAI ESTATES LTD [2019]DLHC9126

MILPAR INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPER LTD AND NII ASHITEY CHURCHILL ARMAH vs. ALFRED N... [2019]DLHC9126

Date	2019-01-15
Suit No.	SUIT NO. FAL/929/13
Citation No.	[2019]DLHC9126

HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE BARBARA TETTEH-CHARWAY (MRS)

MIRACLE ATTACHEY FOR JUSTIN AMENUVOR FOR PLAINTIFF

SAMIR IBRAHIM FOR MOHAMMED SAHNOON FOR 4TH DEFENDANT

PROSPER NYAHE FOR 5TH DEFENDANT

[2019]DLHC9126
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >MILPAR INVESTMENTS &amp;
DEVELOPER LTD AND NII ASHITEY CHURCHILL ARMAH<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFFS)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>ALFRED NII
QUARTEY-PAPAFIO, JOSEPH KWATE QUARTEY-PAPAFIO. ERNESTINA KWAKOR
QUARETY-PAPAFIO, KING ODAIFIO WELENTSI (III), MAX ESTATES LTD AND NTHC/ERIC
ODAI ESTATES LTD<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANTS)<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[HIGH COURT (LAND DIVISION), ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

SUIT
NO. FAL/929/13&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; DATE:
15TH JANUARY, 2019<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>MIRACLE ATTACHEY FOR JUSTIN
AMENUVOR FOR PLAINTIFF&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>SAMIR IBRAHIM FOR MOHAMMED
SAHNOON FOR 4TH DEFENDANT&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

PROSPER
NYAHE FOR 5TH DEFENDANT <o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">

</div><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>&nbsp;[1]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In
their amended writ of summons and statement of claim, the Plaintiffs asserted
that by a deed of assignment dated 12th April 2011, the 1st
Plaintiff, acting by its managing director, the 2nd Plaintiff,
acquired a large parcel of land measuring 126.038 acres from the 1st,
2nd and 3rd Defendants, who are administrators of the
estate of the late Benjamin Quartey-Papafio.&nbsp;
<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[2]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Plaintiffs’ case is that, in a suit to
which they were not parties, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd
Defendants executed terms of settlement with the 4th Defendant. The
said terms of settlement, which was adopted as consent judgment, affected Plaintiff’s
interest in the land subject matter of the said deed of assignment. <o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[3]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Plaintiffs claim that the conduct of the
1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants amounts to fraud
in that they knew or ought to have known that having divested themselves of any
interest in the land, subject matter of the said deed of assignment, they had
no right to make it part of the subject matter of the terms of settlement between
them and the 4th Defendant. <o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[4]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Plaintiffs further claim that the 5th
Defendant, who asserts title to a section of the land in dispute through a
supposed grant from 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants,
as well as, the 6th Defendant, who also claims to be a grantee of
the 4th Defendant, have entered sections of the land in dispute and
have destroyed structures put up by Plaintiff on the said land.<o:p></o:p><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>[5]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; For the above stated reasons, the Plaintiffs
claim against the Defendants jointly and severally, the following reliefs;<o:p></o:p>a.