TONYA ABA FUMILAYO ZWENNES & 2 ORS vs. JACQUELINE L. ZWENNES & ANOR [2020]DLHC10745

Date	2020-05-27
Suit No.	SUIT NO: PA 126/2019
Citation No.	[2020]DLHC10745

HER LADYSHIP EUDORA CHRISTINA DADSON

DAVID KUDUADZI ESQ. FOR THE PLAINTIFF

2ND DEFENDANT APPEARING IN HIS OWN RIGHT

KWAKU AGGREY ORLEANS FOR THE 1ST DEFENDANT/APPLICANT FOR JOINDER

[2020]DLHC10745
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >TONYA ABA FUMILAYO
ZWENNES &amp; 2 ORS<o:p></o:p>(PLAINTIFFS)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>JACQUELINE L. ZWENNES
&amp; ANOR<o:p></o:p>(DEFENDANTS)<o:p></o:p>[HIGH
COURT, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>DAVID KUDUADZI ESQ., FOR THE PLAINTIFF &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; - &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; PRESENT <o:p></o:p>2ND
DEFENDANT APPEARING IN HIS OWN RIGHT&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -PRESENT
<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

KWAKU AGGREY ORLEANS FOR THE 1ST
DEFENDANT/APPLICANT FOR JOINDER&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; PRESENT <o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p>HER
LADYSHIP EUDORA CHRISTINA DADSON<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: windowtext; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm;">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:center;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div>&nbsp;INTRODUCTION<o:p></o:p>The Defendant/Applicant filed a motion
on 5th December 2019 to set aside Plaintiff’s writ of summons and
service thereof. Counsel on 12th March 2020 informs the Court that
the motion was been abandoned save that Plaintiff-Counsel fixed misdescriptions
in paragraphs 11(v) (vi) (vii) of the affidavit in support of the motion.&nbsp; The misdescriptions referred to borders on
the names used by the second and third plaintiff in the writ of summons. <o:p></o:p>Counsel for Plaintiffs have also argued
that the 2nd and 3rd Plaintiffs have appeared and sued in
these names. If the 2nd Defendant has a problem with these names he
is entitled to raise it in his Defence and the Plaintiffs would defend if any
and how they respond to these names.<o:p></o:p>Conclusion<o:p></o:p>It is my considered opinion that the 2nd
and 3rd Plaintiffs have used certain names in their writ of summons
and according to them that is the names they are called. The 2nd
Defendant was unable to furnish this Court with documentary proof that the 2nd
and 3rd Plaintiffs indeed bear different names than what was used in
the Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim as amended. <o:p></o:p>In the circumstances this Court
dismisses the 2nd Defendant request for the Plaintiff-Counsel to fix
misdescriptions stated in paragraphs 11(v)(vi)(vii) of the affidavit in
support. The motion filed on 5th December 2019 to set aside
Plaintiff’s Writ of Summons and Service thereof is dismissed. No order as to
cost. Suit to take its normal course.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;(SGD.)<o:p></o:p>H/L EUDORA CHRISTINA DADSON(MRS)<o:p></o:p>JUSTICE OF THE
HIGH COURT <o:p></o:p>&nbsp;