THE REPUBLIC vs. OSEI ASIBEY AND DANIEL CLIFFORD SARFO EX PARTE: GPRTU OF TUC MAMPONTENG [2021]DLCA10849

THE REPUBLIC vs. OSEI ASIBEY AND DANIEL CLIFFORD SARFO EX PARTE: GPRTU OF TUC M... [2021]DLCA10849

Date	2021-05-20
Suit No.	SUIT NO.: H1/23/2020
Citation No.	[2021]DLCA10849

A. M. DOMAKYAAREH (MRS) J. A. PRESIDING

A. B. POKU-ACHEAMPONG J. A.

S. K. A. ASIEDU J. A.

EDMUND MANU ADUENING FOR APPLICANT/APPELLANT.

ANTHONY OSEI POKU FOR 1ST RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

ISAAC BOBI FOR 2ND RESPONDENT /RESPONDENT.

[2021]DLCA10849
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>OSEI ASIBEY AND DANIEL CLIFFORD SARFO<o:p></o:p>(RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p>EX PARTE: GPRTU OF TUC
MAMPONTENG<o:p></o:p>(APPLICANT/APPELLANT)<o:p></o:p>[COURT
OF APPEAL, KUMASI]<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

</div>COUNSEL:<o:p></o:p>EDMUND
MANU ADUENING FOR APPLICANT/APPELLANT.<o:p></o:p>ANTHONY
OSEI POKU&nbsp; FOR 1ST
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:
justify;line-height:115%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">ISAAC
BOBI FOR 2ND RESPONDENT /RESPONDENT.<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p>A. M. DOMAKYAAREH
(MRS) J. A. PRESIDING, A. B. POKU-ACHEAMPONG J. A., S. K. A. ASIEDU J. A. <o:p></o:p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: windowtext; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm;">

<p class="MsoNormalCxSpMiddle" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:
.0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;text-align:center;line-height:115%;border:none;
mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p>

</div>&nbsp;&nbsp;POKU-ACHEAMPONG,
J.A.:<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;This is an appeal from the ruling of a
Kumasi High Court delivered on 27/11/18 in a contempt matter between the
Applicant/Appellant and the Respondents. <o:p></o:p>&nbsp;Background<o:p></o:p>The 2nd Respondent initially issued
out a writ against the Appellant in November 2015 and pursuant to leave granted
by the court &nbsp;on 3rd April
2017 the said writ was amended to join the 1st Respondent herein
with the following as the amended reliefs.<o:p></o:p>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
An order directing that the parties operate
from their respective taxi stations at Mamponteng – Ashanti per the agreement
reached at the meeting at Kwabre East District Assembly on the 31st
day of July 2015. <o:p></o:p>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
A further order directing at the Kwabre East
District Assembly to grant a continuous renewal of the operating license of the
Plaintiff for its core business.<o:p></o:p>3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
An order of Perpetual Injunction restraining
the Defendants, their agents, assigns, servants, workers or anybody claiming
through them from interfering with the Plaintiff’s rights to operate from its
independent station.<o:p></o:p>4.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;