[2021]DLHC11650 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">SEKONDI-TAKORADI METROPOLITAN ASSEMBLY S.T.M.A<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;tab-stops:102.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">GHANA WATER COMPANY LIMITED<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">[HIGH COURT, SEKONDI]<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">SUIT NO: E12/46/20 DATE: 28<sup>TH</sup> OCTOBER, 2021<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">COUNSEL<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">SAMUEL AGBOTTAH ESQ. FOR PLAINTIFF<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">PETER OSEI ASAMOAH ESQ FOR DEFENDANT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">CORAM<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE DR. RICHMOND OSEI-HWERE J.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: windowtext; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm;"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif"> </span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">On 20<sup>th</sup> May, 2020, the Plaintiff herein caused a writ to be issued out against the Defendant for the following reliefs:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent: -36.0pt;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">i. Declaration that by virtue of the Local Governance Act 2016, Act 936 the Defendant Company is NOT exempted from the payment of property rates to the Plaintiff Assembly.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent: -36.0pt;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">ii. An order that the Defendant pays to the Plaintiff GH¢242,412.16 being the total assessed property rate on the Defendant’s landed properties within Plaintiff’s jurisdiction for the period starting 2016 to 2019 which the Defendant has refused to pay, Demand Notices served on her notwithstanding.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:72.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent: -36.0pt;line-height:150%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">iii. Legal costs incidental and any other relief(s) as may be just.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">The facts of the case as can be gleaned from the pleadings are that the Plaintiff is a Metropolitan Assembly with political and administrative authority over the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolitan area. Defendant is a state owned limited liability company. Defendant owns several properties within the Sekondi-Takoradi metropolis. In exercise of its powers under the Local Governance Act, 2016 (Act 936), Plaintiff made demands on Defendant for payment of property rates in respect of the latter’s properties. Defendant has failed or refused to pay the said property rates based on its position that it is exempt by law from payment of taxes and rates. Aggrieved by Defendant’s stance, Plaintiff has instituted the instant action for the reliefs endorsed on the writ of summons and statement of claim.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">It is the Plaintiff’s case that by the explicit provisions of the Local Governance Act 2016, (Act 936) and more specifically sections 141 and 146 thereof, the Plaintiff is statutorily mandated to levy the properties of the Defendant with the reasons that the Defendant is not and has not been one of the institutions mentioned as being exempted from the payment of such rates by Section 149 (1) & (2) of Act 936.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">According to the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s refusal to pay the property rate has caused and continue to cause untold financial hardship to it.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">Defendant’s case is that, it is a Company set up under the Ghana Water and Sewerage Corporation Act 1965, (Act 310) and that Act 310 expressly exempted Defendant from payment of taxes. That in July 1993, Ghana Water and Sewerage Corporation was by the Statutory Corporations (Conversion to Companies) Act 1993, (Act 461) converted into a Limited Liability Company. Following this conversion, other Metropolitan Assemblies made similar demands on the Defendant for payment of property rates. According to the Defendant, the then Attorney General and Minister of Justice by a letter dated 12th June 1996, advised that the Defendant is exempted from payment of taxes and rates. By another letter dated 1st November 1999, the Attorney General and Minister of Justice at the time re-affirmed that position that the Defendant is by law exempted from payment of taxes and other rates. It is the position of the Defendant that the Local Governance Act 2016, (Act 936) exempts it from paying rates and therefore contends that the Plaintiff is not entitled to the reliefs it seeks from the Court.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">At the Application for Directions stage, the Court directed lawyers for the parties to file written addresses in respect of the central legal issue arising out of the pleadings. The issue is:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height: 150%"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">“WHETHER OR NOT THE DEFENDANT IS BY LAW, EXEMPT FROM TAXES AND RATES, INCLUDING PROPERTY TAX UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNANCE ACT 2016, (ACT 936).”<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">Counsel for the Defendant has taken to the position that by the combined effect of Section 16 of the Ghana Water and Sewerage Corporation Act, 1965 (Act 310); Section 2 of the Statutory Corporations (Conversion to Companies) Act 1993, (Act 651); the Statutory Corporations (Conversion to Companies) (Scheduled Amendments) Instrument 1998 (LI 1648); Section 164 (1) of the Local Governance Act 2016, (Act 936); and Article 295 of the 1992 Constitution, Defendant is in law exempt from the payment of taxes and rates. Consequently, counsel submits that Plaintiff’s case against Defendant is without merit.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">The Local Governance Act 2016, (Act 936) and its predecessor Local Government Act 1993, (Act 462) gives the Plaintiff the power to levy rates. Section 144 of Act 936 grants Plaintiff the exclusive right to levy rates in its Metropolitan Assembly. The provision states:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:36.0pt;line-height: 150%"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">“Rating authority <o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt;text-align:justify;text-indent: 4.5pt;line-height:150%"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">144. A District Assembly shall be the only authority to levy rates for a district despite any customary law to the contrary.”<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt;text-align:justify;line-height: 150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">This statutory power is not absolute. Section 149(1) of Act 936 creates exemptions