RE: IN THE MATTER BETWEEN STEPHEN BOADU And IRAN CLINIC [2021]DLNLC11184

Date	2021-02-17
Suit No.
Citation No.	[2021]DLNLC11184

DR.BERNICE A. WELBECK

[2021]DLNLC11184
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >RE: IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
STEPHEN BOADU<o:p></o:p>And<o:p></o:p>IRAN CLINIC<o:p></o:p>[NLC]<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 31pt 31pt 1pt;">

Our
Ref: NLC/C-401/219/2021/12E&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;DATE: 17TH FEBRUARY, 2021<o:p></o:p>

</div>DIRECTOR, ADMIN /HR FOR COMMISSON:
<o:p></o:p>DR.BERNICE
A. WELBECK <o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

DIRECTIVE<o:p></o:p>

</div>&nbsp;We refer to the Commission's
sitting of Wednesday, 17th February, 2021 at which the parties appeared and were heard.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;The facts of the matter
are that:<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;1.&nbsp;&nbsp;
Complainant was
engaged on a one year fixed contract
subject to renewal upon expiration.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-font-width:105%">2.&nbsp;&nbsp;
As part of the terms of
contract the Complainant who was a Security Officer was not supposed to receive or take any money from anybody or
authority, and this he was fully aware of and signed to, but which he failed to adhere to it thus leading to the
termination of his contract.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:110%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-font-width:105%">3.&nbsp;&nbsp;
Complainant was caught on
camera collecting money from a Police Officer, and Complainant claimed that the said amount, a sum of GH¢100.00 was
collected by him from the said Police Officer to be given to a Doctor of Respondent Clinic.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<h1>Findings<o:p></o:p></h1>&nbsp;The Commission upon
hearing the parties and examining the evidence before it finds that the
Complainant flouted the terms of his
contract by taking or accepting money, which he claimed was given to him by a
Police Officer for a Doctor of the Respondent Clinic.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;Ruling<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;</s</main>