[2022]DLCA16053 Login to Read Full Case <span style="font-size: 18px !important;"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0cm;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:18.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;tab-stops:39.0pt center 243.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0"> DAVID AKWETER NAKOTEY, EDWARD NUERTEY TETTEH<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">(PLAINTIFFS/</span></i> <i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">APPELLANTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0">vs.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;color:#00B0F0;mso-bidi-font-style:italic">TEYE JOSEPH & ORS</span></b><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; color:#00B0F0"><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">(DEFENDANTS/</span></i> <i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">RESPONDENTS)<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif">[COURT OF APPEAL, KOFORIDUA]<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family: "Book Antiqua",serif"> </span></p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">CONSOLIDATED CIVIL APPEA</span> <span style="font-size:10.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">NO: H1/29/2021 DATE: 12<sup>TH</sup> APRIL 2022<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">COUNSEL<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">OSMAN GYAN FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS IN 1ST SUIT AND DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS IN SECOND SUIT<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm; mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">JONATHAN ALUA FOR DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS IN 1ST SUIT AND PLAINTIFFS /RESPONDENTS IN 2ND SUIT<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">CORAM<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">SOWAH J. A. (PRESIDING), OPPONG J. A., MENSAH-HOMIAH J. A.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: windowtext; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm;"> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;border:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt; mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 107%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif">JUDGEMENT<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-latin">MENSAH-HOMIAH, JA:<o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif; mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-latin">INTRODUCTION<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin">We have before us two appeals filed against a ruling of the Circuit Court, Odumase-Krobo, dated 3<sup>rd</sup> August, 2018. The said ruling was in respect of two motions filed pursuant to <b><i>Order 23 rule 6 (1) of the High Court ( Civil Procedure) Rules 2004, C.I.</i></b> <b><i>47</i></b> in two separate suits which were pending before that court, titled: <b><i>(i) David Akwetey Nakotey (suing as head of Ami-Narh Family) & Edward Tetteh Nuertey v. Teye Joseph, Tetteh & Pastor Kwesi Emmanuel Suit No. C1/05/2011</i></b> (the 1<sup>st</sup> suit) and (ii) <b><i>Teye Joseph & Teye Mathew Tetteh v. David Akweter Nakotey & Edward Tetteh Nuertey Suit No, A1/08/2017</i></b><i> </i>(the 2<sup>nd</sup> suit)<i>.</i> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin">It is observed that even though no formal order of consolidation had been made pursuant to Order 31 rule 2 of C.I. 47, the trial court proceeded to deliver one ruling as if the two suits had been consolidated. Since the parties to the two appeals, the subject matter and core issues for our consideration are virtually the same, these appeals would be, and are hereby consolidated.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin">THE ANTECEDENTS<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin">On 2<sup>nd</sup> August 2010, David Akweter Nakotey who describes himself as the head of the Ami-Narh Family of Adjikpo- Adawuranya commenced the 1<sup>st</sup> suit for and on behalf of the said family against the defendants therein at the Circuit Court, Odumase-Krobo. Pursuant to an order of the court, Edward Nuertey Tetteh was joined as the 2<sup>nd</sup> Plaintiff and an amended Writ of Summons was filed on 11<sup>th</sup> December, 2013. (See ROA part 1 page 49). <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin">The reliefs sought in the 1<sup>st </sup>suit included a declaration of title to Plaintiffs’ family land situate at Adjikpo- Adawuranya, Somanya; declaration that the purported grant of Plaintiffs’ family land by 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> Defendants to 3<sup>rd</sup> defendant is void; recovery of possession and damages for trespass. In their statement of <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin">defence, 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> Defendants challenged the capacity of Plaintiffs since they are not the head of the Ami-Narh family. Notwithstanding the challenge to Plaintiffs’ capacity in the 1<sup>st</sup> suit, Defendants therein counterclaimed for declaration of title to the same piece of land, among other reliefs. Plaintiffs also filed their reply and defence to Counterclaim.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin">Application for directions was taken on 26<sup>th</sup> November, 2011 (ROA part 1 page 17) and the parties were consequently ordered to file their respective witness statements together with potential exhibits which was complied with after a series of amendments had been filed. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align: justify;line-height:115%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Book Antiqua",serif;mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-latin">The Defendants in the 1<sup>st</sup> suit filed an amended statement of defence on 12<sup>th</sup> August, 2016 (ROA part 1 page 118). On the same day, they commenced the 2<sup>nd</sup> suit against the Plaintiffs in the 1<sup>st</sup> suit, for similar reliefs as in their counterclaim to the 1<sup>st</sup> suit. Upon service, Defendants in the 2<sup>nd</sup> suit filed <b><i>“a motion for an order to strike out writ of summons for want of capacity”,</i></b> which the court ordered to be tried as a preliminary issue.<o:p></o:p></sp