NOWFILL S. LABA vs. WISSAM LABA, HAIFA KYRIAKOS LABA, CHARLES LABA, J. OPOKU BOATENG AND LATEX FOAM RUBBER PRODUCTS LIMITED [2022]DLHC11451

NOWFILL S. LABA vs. WISSAM LABA, HAIFA KYRIAKOS LABA, CHARLES LABA, J. OPOKU BO... [2022]DLHC11451

Date	2022-05-09
Suit No.	SUIT NO. GJ/0756/2021
Citation No.	[2022]DLHC11451

HIS LORDSHIP FRANCIS OBIRI ‘J’.

SAMUEL ADU BOAHEN FOR APPLICANT/RESPONDENT

AUGUSTINE KIDISIL FOR 1ST 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS/APPLICANTS

[2022]DLHC11451
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >IN THE
MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2019 (ACT 992)<o:p></o:p>AND<o:p></o:p>IN THE
MATTER OF AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 218 FOR INJUNCTION AND DECLARATION<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;NOWFILL S.
LABA<o:p></o:p>(APPLICANT/RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>WISSAM LABA,
HAIFA KYRIAKOS LABA, CHARLES LABA, J. OPOKU BOATENG AND LATEX FOAM RUBBER
PRODUCTS LIMITED<o:p></o:p>(RESPONDENT/APPLICANT)<o:p></o:p>[HIGH COURT, ACCRA]<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

</div>COUNSEL&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>SAMUEL ADU BOAHEN
FOR APPLICANT/RESPONDENT<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt;">

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:
justify;line-height:150%;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:0cm 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">AUGUSTINE
KIDISIL FOR 1ST, 2ND AND 3RD
RESPONDENTS/APPLICANTS<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM:<o:p></o:p>HIS LORDSHIP FRANCIS OBIRI ‘J’.<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: windowtext; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm;">

<p class="MsoNoSpacing" align="center" style="text-align:center;border:none;
mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0cm;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0cm 1.0pt 0cm">RULING<o:p></o:p>

</div>&nbsp;On 27th October
2021, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd
Respondents/Applicants (hereinafter called the Applicants) filed motion on
notice for Interlocutory Injunction pending the determination of this suit. They
also prayed for further order restraining the Applicant/Respondent (the
Respondent), Salem Nahlous, the General Manager of the 5th
Respondent Company, Jamil Mouganie and the 5th Respondent’s
officers, agents or assigns from doing the following acts pending the final
determinate of this matter.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB">a.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Reversing the termination
or dismissal of Jamil Mouganie or any other persons lawfully dismissed by the 5th
Respondent through the 3rd Applicant before the present suit.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB">b.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Paying Jamil Mouganie, a
salary or permitting him to enjoy any employment benefits/entitlements of the 5th
Respondent Company.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB">c.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Permitting persons dismissed
by the 5th Respondent including Jamil Mouganie from accessing the
premises of the 5th Respondent Company, its books, records and
assets.<o:p></o:p><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;mso-bidi-font-family:&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB">d.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Allowing the said Jamil
Mouganie to hold himself out as an employee or agent of the 5th
Respondent Company or to interfere with the 5th Respondent’s
business or operations.<o:p></o:p>