FRANCIS CUDJOE vs. WESTEC SECURITY SYSTEM [2022]DLNLC15025

Date	2022-11-28
Suit No.
Citation No.	[2022]DLNLC15025

DR. BERNICE WELBECK

[2022]DLNLC15025
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >FRANCIS
CUDJOE<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>WESTEC
SECURITY SYSTEM<o:p></o:p>[NLC]<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; padding: 0in 0in 1pt;">

Our Ref:
NLC/C-700/018/022/101&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;28TH NOVEMBER 2022<o:p></o:p>

</div>DIRECTOR, ADMIN/HR:<o:p></o:p>DR. BERNICE WELBECK<o:p></o:p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: windowtext; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: windowtext; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0in;">

<p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center;border:none;
mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;mso-border-bottom-alt:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:1.0pt 0in 1.0pt 0in">DECISION<o:p></o:p>

</div>On Wednesday, 16TH November 2022 the parties
were invited to appear before
the National Labour Commission in the above-mentioned dispute.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;The Complainant
appeared, but Respondent was absent and the
records show that the Respondent has been unco-operative
since the dispute was brought against it.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<h1 style="margin-left:0in;text-align:justify">Complainant's Case<o:p></o:p></h1>&nbsp;The complainant
submitted that he was a former
employee of respondent company
whose appointment was .suddenly
terminated when he refused to resign at the instance of the Respondent.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<h1 style="margin-left:0in">Respondent Case<o:p></o:p></h1>&nbsp;Respondent failed
and/or refused to submit its response to the complaint and also did not attend any of the hearings in
the matter though it was invited.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<h1 style="margin-left:0in">Findings<o:p></o:p></h1>&nbsp;The Commission upon hearing the Complainant's submissions
and examining the evidence he presented finds that the complainant's
appointment was not terminated but instead he was compulsorily retired upon
attainment of age 60.<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;Decision<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;The Commission hereby dismisses the complaint
brought by the complainant against the Respondent for lack of merit.<o:p></o:p>

<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></main>