THE REPUBLIC vs. AYAOVI PROSPER AMENYAGLO vs. EX PARTE: GADEGBEKU SAVIOUR DELA, ECCARIUS ACHILLE KOAMI JOEL [2023]DLHC16975

THE REPUBLIC vs. AYAOVI PROSPER AMENYAGLO vs. EX PARTE: GADEGBEKU SAVIOUR DELA,... [2023]DLHC16975

Date	2023-04-18
Suit No.	SUIT NO. E13/81/2022
Citation No.	[2023]DLHC16975

HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE NAANA BEDU ADDO

JEMIMA ADDO

[2023]DLHC16975
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" >THE REPUBLIC<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>AYAOVI PROSPER AMENYAGLO<o:p></o:p>(RESPONDENT)<o:p></o:p>vs.<o:p></o:p>EX PARTE: GADEGBEKU SAVIOUR DELA, ECCARIUS
ACHILLE KOAMI JOEL<o:p></o:p>(PPLICANTS)<o:p></o:p>[HIGH
COURT, TEMA]<o:p></o:p>&nbsp;<div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: black; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt; margin-left: 4.5pt; margin-right: 7.1pt;">

<a name="_heading=h.gjdgxs"></a>SUIT NO. E13/81/2022&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;DATE: 18TH APRIL 2023<o:p></o:p>

</div>COUNSEL&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <o:p></o:p><div style="border-top: none; border-right: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: black; padding: 0cm 0cm 1pt; margin-left: 4.5pt; margin-right: 7.1pt;">

JEMIMA ADDO FOR APPLICANTS<o:p></o:p>

</div>CORAM<o:p></o:p>HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE NAANA
BEDU ADDO <o:p></o:p><div style="border-top-width: 1.5pt; border-top-color: black; border-left: none; border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; border-bottom-color: black; border-right: none; padding: 1pt 0cm; margin-left: 4.5pt; margin-right: 7.1pt;">

JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p>

</div>BY COURT:
Before this Court is a Motion
on Notice for an Order
for Committal for Contempt filed on 10th August, 2022. The Deponent filed an Affidavit in Opposition on
20/09/2022. He claimed in Paragraph 9 that the Applicants are his children
and therefore he would not
deny them what rightfully belongs to them. He claims it was a simple
misunderstanding between the parties. A supplementary Affidavit was filed by
the Applicants with the leave of the Court on 14/2/2023. Though the Respondent was served, he
refused to file any response thereto. He stated that the property belongs to
him, he claims it was given to him by his mother. He claimed he has not done
anything for him to be cited
in contempt. He finally claimed
that he did not file any Affidavit in Opposition to the
instant suit and that he did not know who filed it. The Court found the
Respondent’s behaviour very confrontational and his demeanour very
disrespectful to the Court. Given
that he claims
he has no response to the instant
motion, the Court hereby
grants</main>