BORIS FIDELIS vs. JANET MIKADO [2023]DLHC17054

Date	2023-03-17
Suit No.	SUIT NO: E12/29/2021
Citation No.	[2023]DLHC17054

HIS LORDSHIP AYITEY ARMAH-TETTEH J.

MR. OSCAR VULOR FOR PLAINTIFF

[2023]DLHC17054
																																						<div class="restriction-wrapper">
														<div class="container-lg">
															<div class="row">
																<div class="col-md-12 restricted-content">
																	<div class="restricted-content-img-wrapper">
																		<div class="lock-icon bounce-7">
																			<img class=""
																				src="https://www.dennislawgh.com/dl-assets/dl-images/lock-content.png"
																				alt="Subscription based content">
																		</div>
																	</div>
																	 
																		<a href="https://www.dennislawgh.com/login"
																		class="btn btn-primary btn-lg"
																		style="font-family: 'open sans'; text-transform: capitalize; border-radius: 8px"> 
																		Login to Read Full Case </a>
																	 
																	
																</div>
															</div>
														</div>
													</div>
													<main id="main" class="content" style="min-height: 60rem" ><div class="WordSection1">

<a name="_Hlk152849823">BORIS FIDELIS <o:p></o:p></a>

(PLAINTIFF)<o:p></o:p>

vs.<o:p></o:p>

JANET MIKADO <o:p></o:p>

(DEFENDANT)<o:p></o:p>

[HIGH COURT, HOHOE]<o:p></o:p>

SUIT NO: E12/29/2021
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;DATE: 17TH MARCH 2023<o:p></o:p>

</div>

COUNSEL<o:p></o:p>

</div>

</div>

&nbsp;

JUDGMENT<o:p></o:p>

</div>

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

The Plaintiff
on 29 January 2021 issued out a writ of summons against the defendant claiming
the following reliefs:<o:p></o:p>

<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-top:9.95pt;margin-right:6.75pt;
margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:44.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify;
text-indent:-18.0pt;line-height:150%;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3;tab-stops:44.0pt">1.<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-kerning: auto; font-optical-sizing: auto; font-feature-settings: normal; font-variation-settings: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The
Plaintiff’s claim is for special damages for deciept (sic) by the Defendant for
wrongfully, intentionally and falsely representing that Plaintiff was
responsible for the pregnancy for which act the Plaintiff suffered damages
against the defendant.

2.<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-kerning: auto; font-optical-sizing: auto; font-feature-settings: normal; font-variation-settings: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; General damages for deceipt(sic).

3.<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; font-variant-alternates: normal; font-kerning: auto; font-optical-sizing: auto; font-feature-settings: normal; font-variation-settings: normal; font-variant-position: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Costs<o:p></o:p>

&nbsp;

Briefly, the Plaintiff’s claim is that in the month of November 2019, the defendant lodged a complaint at the Domestic Violence and Victim Support Unit (DOVVSU) of the Ghana
Police Service, Hohoe against the Plaintiff that she was impregnated by the
Plaintiff. According to the Plaintiff he denied the allegation when he was called to the office
of the Divisional Commander of
Police with CHRAJ and the D</main>